Today the Senate has adopted an amendment to the Employment
Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) from Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) that would prevent
retaliation against religious organizations.
It was only Monday, the ENDA achieved enough support in the Senate to
move the bill towards a vote on final passage.
The ENDA is a bill that would make discrimination based on "an
individual's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity"
illegal in such areas as hiring, firing and compensation in both the private
and public workplaces. The measure would treat "sexual orientation"
and "gender identity" in a fashion similar to other federally protected
categories, such as race, gender, age and religion.
As it stands now, twenty-one states and the District of
Columbia have laws prohibiting workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation and many corporations have their own fully inclusive policies in
place. Current federal laws
prevent workplace discrimination based upon age, color, disability, genetic
information, national origin, race, religion and, sex, but no such protections
occur for sexual orientation and gender identity.
Different versions of the ENDA have been introduced since
1994 and the Senate last considered a version of ENDA in 1996, but the bill
failed by one vote. There are reports
that the bill is unlikely to even be brought to a vote in the House as Speaker
John Boehner is not in favor of the bill.
Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said in an email that “The Speaker
believes this legislation will increase frivolous litigation and cost American
jobs, especially small business jobs.” The Washington Post has reported that states
with laws similar to ENDA “have not seen a noticeable increase in litigation
based on sexual orientation or gender identity.”
If the bill is passed, potential remedies for violating the
law would be on par with other cases of employment discrimination. The former
employee could potentially get the job or promotion they were denied, be
awarded back pay and litigation costs and/or related compensatory or punitive
damages.
No comments:
Post a Comment